
Waste
Transportation
For many people, the thoughts
about how waste is transported begins and ends with the municipal
truck that collects trash along residential streets and then
disappears around the corner on its way to a local landfill. The
broader reality, however, it that the methods used for for
transporting the many types of wastes created worldwide is extremely
varied. Every day, wastes are transported by trucks, semi-trailers,
tankers, trains and other forms of specialized vehicles.
British, and in business? You
may need
building trade insurance,
butcher
insurance, even
hairdressing insurance cover.
The types of wastes transported can range from common household
garbage to radioactive fuel by-products. Depending on the type of
waste, there are many safety and handling regulations in place to
assure public and environmental protection; especially for the
transportation of hazardous and radioactive substances. But even
with these regulations in place, there are still many concerns
surrounding the human and environmental impacts associated with how
waste is moved from one place to another.
The largest segment of waste transportation centers upon municipal
household and business trash. Worldwide, hundreds of thousands of
vehicles are used daily for the collection, transport, processing,
compaction and other steps necessary for moving trash from its
source to a final disposal point like a landfill. All of these
vehicles generate dust, carbon based emissions and noise pollution
that can have adverse human and environmental impacts. Ironically,
the increase of municipal, curbside recycling programs demanded by
the public actually resulted in a net increase of waste removal
vehicles required due to the additional, separate collection of
recyclable goods. In order to reduce the negative impacts of waste
collection and transportation vehicles, many municipalities are
seeking ways to introduce more methane burning and gas/electric
hybrid vehicles into their waste management fleets.
The increased amounts of wastes generated by humans and the
shrinking availability of land available for landfills have also
increased the distances waste must be shipped for final disposal. In
example, the City of Islip, New York no longer operates its own
waste disposal facility. All of the trash arising from the city is
now shipped to remote sites, some as far away as North Carolina.
This trend by many municipalities due to local landfill overcapacity
has led to large amounts of trash now being transported by large
semi-trailers, trains and barges over great distances. In addition
to the pollutants these large vehicles generate, some people are
concerned about the transportation of these high volumes of waste
through their communities and the possible risks involved as the
result of accidents or potential contamination of local water
sources.
The transportation of hazardous and nuclear wastes are, by far, the
biggest concern to both countries and the general public. Although
this segment of the transportation industry is one of the most
highly regulated, there has been a steady increase in the amount of
accidents and spills involving hazardous waste vehicles as humans
continue to generate more of these types of waste. Hazardous wastes
are also much more expensive to dispose of or process. In the United
States alone, it can cost over $2,500 per ton for the transportation
and safe disposal of hazardous materials. These high costs have led
to the practice of selling hazardous wastes to developing countries
for disposal at much lower costs. Unfortunately, these developing
countries often lack the resources needed for implementing and
enforcing the necessary regulations for protecting the public and
the environment from the adverse impacts these types of waste can
generate.
As with most waste disposal challenges, decreasing the amounts of
all types of wastes generated by humans is the best way for
decreasing their negative impacts. This is especially true is
relationship to waste transportation because it is the biggest
contributor to both the cost and potential negative impacts of
disposal methods.
Copyright Fell Environmental 2010 |